A little learning. A little more confidence.Your next step starts here

GRC & Audit Support · Lesson 4 of 8

From requirements to controls

A requirement states an expected outcome. A control is an action or safeguard intended to support that outcome. Evidence helps a reviewer assess whether it operates.

SEE THE IDEA

Trace the claim to proof

Illustrative access-review requirement.

  1. Requirement

    Remove inappropriate access.

  2. Control

    Managers review permissions; owners implement approved removals.

  3. Evidence

    Review decisions plus removal records and verification.

Each link should address the same scope and period. A policy document alone does not prove the control operated.
Read the visualWhat is missing if you only have a completed review spreadsheet?

Evidence that required access changes were implemented and verified.

Define the expected result

Use an applicable requirement and a clear scope. Do not assume a framework automatically creates a legal obligation.

Describe the control

State who does what, when, and for which systems. Broad statements such as we review access are hard to test.

Plan a test

Identify what evidence could demonstrate operation during the period. A written policy alone does not establish execution.

Put it in context

Requirement: inappropriate access is removed. Control: managers review listed permissions quarterly and owners implement approved removals. Evidence includes the review and removal records.

Connect requirement, control, and evidence without treating them as interchangeable.

Read the sources

Make it stick.

Try one short question to check your understanding and save this lesson to your progress.

YOUR LEARNING SPACE