A little learning. A little more confidence.Your next step starts here

Identity & Access Management · Lesson 7 of 8

Running an access review

An access review asks whether current permissions still have a justified owner and business purpose. The decision must be followed by implementation.

SEE THE IDEA

Close the loop after the review

Fictional contractor export permission.

  1. Decision
    Manager rejects access

    Record the reason and authorized removal decision.

  2. Action
    IAM owner removes permission

    Track the change in the relevant system.

  3. Verification
    Effective access checked

    Record evidence that export access is no longer available.

A review decision and an implemented change are different events.
Read the visualIs the first step enough to mark the removal complete?

No. The authorized change must be implemented and verified.

Give reviewers context

Provide the identity, resource, permission, owner, and relevant usage information. Lack of recent use is a clue, not automatic proof of no need.

Record a decision

Approve justified access, request clarification, or recommend removal under policy. Do not approve an entire list without examination.

Close the loop

Track resulting changes and verify them. A checked box in the review is not proof that access changed.

Put it in context

A manager rejects export access for a contractor. The IAM team removes it and records verification, completing the review action.

Review decisions need evidence and verified follow-through.

Read the sources

Make it stick.

Try one short question to check your understanding and save this lesson to your progress.

YOUR LEARNING SPACE